Fundamentally, Bannerlord is the same as Warband, the spruced-up and expanded 2010 reissue of Mount & Blade most people refer to. That's absolutely fine, and exactly what TaleWorlds said it would be. That's absolutely fine, and exactly what TaleWorlds said it would be.Mount & Blade 2: Bannerlord review The exact same old battles sewn onto a perfunctory, shallow RPG and an elaborate but undramatic and robotic feudalism sim Developer: TaleWorlds Entertainment Publisher: TaleWorlds Entertainment Release: Out now On: Windows 7 & and up From: Steam Price: £40 / €50 / $50 Ahoy my bros! Did my annual video for an overall Early Access update on Bannerlord. In short, yes I feel it's absolutely worth it and the game is in the best state it has been since launch with SO many improvements. Across the vastly improved siege experience, the order of battle & battle terrain systems, improved kingdom diplomacy & transparency, better combat AI, spear bracing, crafting Unlike Warband, Bannerlord is not Mount & Blade+. Maybe for the best to let it stand on its own instead of holding it to the standards of Warband. Also as Tuidjy said. The game has in both instances (original and warband) staggered out awkwardly and took some time to gain its footing.
It's been about 2 and a half years since our preview article on the Early Access release of Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord.This article listed the major differences between Bannerlord and the original MB/Warband, mentioned the features the game might have gotten by the time of its full release (based on various bits and pieces of data that had been spotted in the game's files), before closing on
ierQ5.